sxr71;364651 Wrote: 
> Fair enough. The expandability is a plus. Also when I learned that you
> can feed a clock signal to it that made it a bit more interesting. I
> would in the future consider getting it and slaving it to an external
> DAC. Still I think $2000 is a little much for a "Super Squeezebox"
> assuming the intent is to connect it to a DAC. A version lacking any
> analog outputs solely designed to be connected be to a DAC for
> $800-1000 would be simply killer. I guess that since Slim Devices is
> addressing the audiophile market they could segment their audiophile
> products a little like that.

Yes, the external clock input was a nice plus too on my list that I'm
not taking advantage of now but may in the future.

I agree a Tranport Transporter would sell big. A lot of folks refuse to
pay for the analog half when they don't need it.

At this point though the total cost savings to build a Transporter with
no analog might save 10%, if that (a few chips and a few jacks) plus the
work to design it out. And the volume still might not be large enough to
justify it.

It might be cheaper for them to just lower the price and include it.


-- 
mswlogo

XP > Cat5 > Transporter > SPDIF > Meridian G68 > DSP6000, DSP5500HC,
DSP5000
XP > Cat5 > SB3 > SPDIF > Meridian DSP5000
XP > Cat5 > SB3 > SPDIF > Meridian G91 > DSP5000

'My Transporter Setup'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=350741&postcount=45)
'Hitch Hikers Guide to Meridian' (http://www.meridianunplugged.com)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54947

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to