Themis;373169 Wrote: > Choosing has nothing to do. We are actually measuring the probability > that someone can accidentally find the difference.
Sorry, I don't follow you. > > But, this is NOT what the methodology is used to measure. It pretends > to measure something else : the perceived difference. So, the > methodology is flawed. ;) Again - no idea what you're saying. ABX measures whether a difference is audible, or not. > > Easy. Scientific measures prove it. THDs, S/N ratios, etc. > We know it's different, that's not the point of the ABX tests. Huh? You're not seriously claiming that because we can measure a difference in (say) THD, that means there's an audible difference? That would be totally absurd, so I can't imagine that's what you're saying. Please clarify. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=56425 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
