Alfafa;378993 Wrote: > Hi Bjørn > > The higher samplerate would reproduce the original with a higher > resolution. I can't say that I can hear because I haven't heard 96kHz > and 192kHz side by side >
Phil is right. I think that sometimes there is some confusion in terminology. Technically resolution refers to bit-depth (i.e. the precision of each sample) and sampling rate refers to the number samples per time unit. The combination of high bit- and samplingrates should perhaps be called high-definition (audio)? Anyway according to the Lavry paper very high sampling rates actually results in lower precision, i.e. resolution. But then there is the speed argument. I.e. the necessity of extremely high sampling rates in capturing transients. I haven't really seen any technical arguments, but it should be possible to approximately measure how long the attack of a snare drum or whatever lasts and compare it to the sampling rate. -- bhaagensen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57631
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
