Phil Leigh;439552 Wrote: 
> Chris,
> 
> I don't understand your point about TCP/IP being irrelevant - to me is
> critical since it lets me keep the clock and the jitter aspects locked
> inside the SB - the PC is completely out of the jitter equation. On ANY
> PC+card solution, jitter will be influenced by what is happening in the
> PC. This is simply never the case in an SB-based solution.
> 
> Anyway, interesting discussion!

That's true but at the end, even with the presence of this “noisy”
environment, they manage to achieve very respectable low jitter numbers
using 150$ soundcard namely the j...@. As you know they slow the
processor, lover the supply tension, limit bus traffic, detune Windows,
do some other tricks and use this particular player (cpaly). Thus TCP/IP
or not they do it and therefore the transfer protocol seems irrelevant
to the result.  That was my point. Some of them even pretend it sound
better than SD products  ;-)


-- 
krzys
------------------------------------------------------------------------
krzys's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2256
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65422

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to