Kuro;513113 Wrote: > Hi Phil, > > TacT does resampling to 96K regardless of input. All internal DSP > processing are done at 96K samples and 48-bit precision. It is actually > worst to feed it 96K as the ASRC is not bypassable, so it'll resample > 96K to 96K. Peter Lyngdorf has stated that resampling at the same > frequency will cause artifacts. I can tell on my system that 96K input > to my 2.2xp is not as good sounding as 44.1K or 48K. The best is > actually to feed the TacT with 48K, as the ASRC can do a much easier job > with integer multiple of upsampling. > > 44.1K and 48K are nearly identical sounding if you're like me having an > Apogee Big Ben in the loop. Otherwise, 48K is tiny bit better sounding > than 44.1K. > > Also, beware that the ASRC chip in the TacT is very sensitive to > jitter. It is behaving like a DAC, jitter can cause inaccurate samples > to be created while upsampling.
Finally had time to check some FACTS. You are wrong. As I stated, the TACT RCS2.2X has 24/192 digital inputs and upsamples everything to that rate, regardless of its original rate. Internal DSP is indeed performed with 48-bit precision. http://www.tactlab.com/Products/RCS22X/features.html -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... SB Touch Beta (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69145 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
