michael123;516461 Wrote:
> - What was the command line for minimum phase?
> - Which SoX version did you use for polyphase and rabbit? Could you
> please post command line as well?
Hello Michael,
Sure, I compared these:
Code:
--------------------
/usr/share/squeezeboxserver/Bin/i386-linux/sox -v0.965 --buffer 32768 -t
flac -r44100 -2 -c2 original.flac -t flac -C0 -3 -c2 -r96000 rabbit.flac rabbit
-c0
--------------------
Code:
--------------------
/usr/share/squeezeboxserver/Bin/i386-linux/sox -v0.965 --buffer 32768 -t
flac -r44100 -2 -c2 original.flac -t flac -C0 -3 -c2 -r96000 polyphase.flac
polyphase -cutoff 1.0
--------------------
Code:
--------------------
/usr/share/squeezeboxserver/Bin/i386-linux/sox -v0.965 --buffer 32768 -t
flac -r44100 -2 -c2 origineel.flac -t flac -C0 -3 -c2 -r96000 -D rate -Mav -b 85
--------------------
It was clear (for us) the rate method was sounding worst. Rabbit sounds
quite good and with some advantages over polyphase (cleaner highs, very
detailed and precise) but polyphase sounded the most musical with a bit
more body to the sound.
Ronald
--
tingtong5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69145
_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
