michael123;560459 Wrote: > Transporter is good design, but it can be improved. > IMHO, looking beyond its cover, it merely follows one of reference AKM > designs with very small changes.. All components there are cheap as few > cents.. > Except for Jung regulators that do their work well.. > > Not really "ton of engineering", but still good design. > > As I wrote earlier, after listening for few hours A/B against EMM Labs > 30K$ CD/DAC player, I could not distinguish.. Transport-wise, these > were the same, analog-wise there were some subtle differences, but very > small, and I could not tell which one is better... > > > If I could, I would replace the clock in Transporter.. 11ps is good, > but not the best.. And 96/24 bothers me sometimes.. (when I have these > 192/24 masters)
I think Sean would have something to say about this bit of armchair-engineering commentary. I'd like to see you design something better. All components are "cheap, a few cents". Just because they're cheap doesn't mean they're bad. And just because they cost more doesn't make them better. -- SuperQ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=80282 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
