Yes--I am looking for specific tracks/recordings where the poster found the hi-res encoding sounded better than the CD-quality encoding. The encodings/files would have to have originated from the same hi-res master or what would be the point? I have lots of CDs that have been remastered multiple times and they all sound different.
The point of what I was asking was to try to find out whether on my system I can actually discern a difference when the only difference in the files is the bit depth and the sampling rate. Just listening to some hi-res tracks that sound great says nothing, as many CD-quality sources also sound great. Thus, what I want are a few -specific recordings/tracks- (that originated from a hi-res master) that are available as both 24/96 (or 96/24 if you prefer) and 16/44 encoded FLAC files. I had assumed that with all the previous discussion of hi-res files here that several posters would be able to provide such examples. -- ncarver ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ncarver's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15905 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81634 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
