Robin Bowes;581981 Wrote:
>
>
> That's not so. I recall a test in some photography magazine where they
> took two pictures of the same subject with essentially the same
> camera,
> except one had a digital body, the other was (high quality) film. They
> then blew up both photos very large. The digital one was far better.
> It
> had better colour balance and better resolution.
>
And to make matters more interesting: most places humans take film for
processing, it is converted to digital for printing, not the old
"darkroom" method and chemical mixes. So the difference is where the
'analog' real world is converted to digital: at the camera itself or
at the photo processor.
This is similar to how many home receivers convert all their analog
inputs to digital to process the signal in dubious ways. ("Lets make
it sound like an arena... why?")
So using the SB's internal DAC may actually be worse depending on where
the signal goes.
--
snarlydwarf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
snarlydwarf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1179
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82520
_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
