On 27/10/10 00:55, earwaxer9 wrote: > > Robin Bowes;585236 Wrote: >> On 26/10/10 17:20, earwaxer9 wrote:[color=blue] >>> >> >> >> You expected to hear a difference, so you did. Only there was no >> difference, because there was no change. >> >> Ladies & gentlemen, I give you a prime example of expectation bias! >> >> R.l] >> -- >> "Feed that ego and you starve the soul" - Colonel J.D. Wilkes >> [url]http://www.theshackshakers.com/[/ur > > Ok - good point - I did experiment with the sharp and slow filter. Not > much of a difference. I think I like the slow filter better. The sound > - in general is better - IMHO
I couldn't hear any difference between the two, but I've not done extensive listening. R. -- "Feed that ego and you starve the soul" - Colonel J.D. Wilkes http://www.theshackshakers.com/ _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
