For those who are comfortable with linux and writing command-line
instructions, brutefir / brutefirDRC works with 7.5.x server and
7.5/7.6 SBTouch. What is lacking compared to brutefirDRC on older SB is
the ability to select filters via the remote.

I have brutefir room correction running on SBTouch, streaming flac or
pcm at various sample rates and on a 2-yr old 2-core server (3GHz),
brutefir only consumes 2% per channel for 44.1kHz audio, 4% per channel
on 96kHz audio. I understand fir correction on Windows is heavier on the
CPU.

I have not heard a system with Inguz, but the measurement and
correction are similar, so when working to spec, I expect brutefir and
Inguz to give similar results. Some posts compared DEQ2496 v Inguz. I
can say from my experience that Behringer digital EQ is way inferior to
brutefir for room correction. It veils the sound, and dialing in eq is
just guesswork. I have some bad room modes due to hard flooring, walls
and ceiling, and digital room correction was always needed. Going just
the passive room treatment route would have made part of my listening
area (main hall in the home) look a mess.


-- 
mervin_b
------------------------------------------------------------------------
mervin_b's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42376
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=77084

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to