Lately I’ve been seeing a resurgence of claims about how much better
vinyl is compared to digital. I have an SB3 feeding a Benchmark DAC and
I love it! The sound is wonderful. I also have about 200 LPs in my
closet that I listen to occasionally on my somewhat mid-fi B&O
turntable with an MMC2 cartridge. While the sound from my turntable is
nice, it is not in the same league as my digital input. Naturally, I’m
always looking for something better. So, out of curiosity, I went to a
dealer who showed me a Rega P3-25 turntable. I wasn’t impressed. The
highs seemed somewhat rolled off, and the detail wasn’t nearly as good
as my SB3/DAC. Given the fact that vinyl is so much more of a hassle
than digital, the only reason I would ever considering upgrading my
turntable is this supposed vast improvement in sound.

Now I’m thinking – Either these claims are totally bogus, or I’m just
looking in the wrong price range. The retail cost of the Rega table,
cartridge and phono preamp was about $1500, which is comparable to the
cost of my SB3 and Benchmark DAC 1. How high up the food chain do you
have to go to get this “better than digital” sound that people are
claiming? Does anybody have a good digital front end (i.e. comparable
to a Benchmark, Berkeley, Wavelength Audio Proton, etc.)  with an
analog front end that they think sounds better?


-- 
duke43j
------------------------------------------------------------------------
duke43j's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15911
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85590

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to