magiccarpetride;611122 Wrote: 
> Let me turn the tables for a moment here, and ask a pointed question:
> if, by comparing two audio components side-by-side, you can definitely
> hear a difference, do you think that difference can be measured?
> 
> By 'measured' I mean detected using some measuring equipment,
> preferably with buttons and dials and blinking lights and beeping
> sounds. In the most ideal case, that measuring device would even be
> able to print out a histogram.Not necessarily. I don't believe that qualities 
> such as soundstage,
depth of image, "palpability", etc., are able to be measured using
methodologies discussed here.

IF they were, why aren't companies/review mags publishing such results?
I value imaging, depth of soundstage, etc. very much. If I could be
assured that component 'A' gives 30% more soundstage depth than 'B' at
a comparable price (or whatever premium I am willing to pay) that
knowledge would be of great value when making purchasing decisions.


-- 
Rick58

Bits: Azur 840C; Squiggles: Thorens TD-145; Pre-Heater: McIntosh C220;
Heater: Bottlehead Paramount 300B; Wavemakers: Triangle Titus, NHT Sub
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rick58's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42940
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85681

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to