A question popped into my head today: if indeed audio component burn-in is a verifiable (or, close to verifiable) fact (as many claim), how is it that used components are cheaper than the new ones? Shouldn't it be the other way around?
The way I look at it, time is money, and also time is one commodity that is very hard to buy. So if I'm willing to pay $x.xx dollars for a spanking brand new component, and then be expected to invest yyy hours of burn-in, shouldn't the already burnt-in component be worth $x.xx + $yyy? Troll away! -- magiccarpetride ------------------------------------------------------------------------ magiccarpetride's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37863 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=86359 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
