pippin;655180 Wrote: 
> If you've got even a basic understand on Shannon's theorem and about how
> digital audio recording works then you know that there is nothing you
> can improve with 384kHz sample rate but a lot of things you can make
> worse.
> If you BELIEVE that actual 96kHz recordings are an improvement over
> 48kHz (which is debatable. I have a few recordings where I tend to hear
> a difference but that could as well be due to bad processing on the
> 48kHz side) then 192kHz is what you want to go for in mastering to be
> able to do processing. But even THEN there will be zero advantage SQ
> wise in using 192kHz sample rate files for playback, the only advantage
> is that you don't have to do processing or handling of two sets of files
> if you've got the 192-files anyway.
> You will not get SQ improvements beyond 96kHz (certainly also not
> beyond 88.2 but I don't think that's anything somebody's shooting at
> today, it's just a mastering format for 44.1).

Unfortunately many people out there think that raising the kHz from
44.1 also changes the info below 20kHz because they were fed with some
misleading marketing graphs with more tiny steps in some funny
waveform. And yes, the most improvement of raising bits and kHz is
heard by people that seem to have no clue how digital audio works. I
meant 88.2kHz because this already is more then overkill for all
humans. With 44.1kHz you can at least argue about some bad filtering
that may create side-effects. With todays software and knowledge about
handling these difficulties even this should be a non-issue.


-- 
Wombat

Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89733

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to