Mnyb;683801 Wrote: 
> I'm with gary here , there really is no plausible cause and effect for
> cat6 cable sounding better.
> The odds are in favor of a cognitive effect of some kind .
> 
> screened ethernet cable is not always good thing ( cat 6 can be that )
> then there is risk of conecting the ground planes of the router/ switch
> and your hifi.
The difference between cat5 and cat5e/6 is in how the design supports
higher and higher throughput. Exactly like garym and Mnyb are saying,
data integrity is maintained irrespective of cables. 

I think people sometimes forget that all the way from the file on the
HDD through the entire digital chain in to the DAC of the SB, there is
built in fault tolerance. Weather you have cat5 or even cat7 will not
change the the data bits in any way shape or form. This is true also
for wifi, since the same protocols are used to secure that all bits
arrive without errors, I guess bit perfect is the term used... 
Errors MAY of course occur, and that is where we see a difference
between the cable types. A cat5 can typically support up to 100mbps
without errors, which by the way is several times more than required
for transporting music. Cat 5e and higher allows for even higher bit
rates even at longer distances than normal house wiring.

The key point however is that any errors that occur are fully
corrected, typically by retransmission. So the more errors you get, the
lower the actual data rate becomes (negotiated by the protocol). If the
throughput becomes too low, mostly experienced with wifi, it can be
heard through silent periods in the music. But never ever is there a
degradation in the actual data due to any errors regardless of wifi or
cable! Thus any effect heard can in fact only be cognitive as you say
Mnyb.

I wouldn't worry at all, your cat5 is more than able to handle
streaming of all your music regardless of bitrate. You will most likely
be able to stream even HD video without issues if you wanted... 

Cat5 can actually also be shielded, but signal to noise ratio in home
eth cabling is generally so good that it is not required. There is no
heavy machinery with large electric motors or similar to produce the
type of EMI that creates problems. Having to pull the cable a long way
together with electric wiring may be an issue and potentially requires
shielding though (depending on cable type and throughput requirement).
For extremely low level signals like from the TV antenna, shielding is
a must.

One thing that I don't fully understand however, are the references I
find about issues related to grounding via cables. In cases where the
equipment has a ground connection (via power cable), they are abvously
already "connected" right? But any manufacturer of audio equipment
would make sure that proper galvanic isolation is maintained would they
not? 
In the case of the SB, or any (most consumer at least) router/switch,
there is no grounding pin so I guess it could potentially be so that
shielding would create that connection. But then again the signal wires
of the cable provide galvanic connection as well, although it ends at
the Rx/Tx buffer in the SB does it not? And since the SB is not able to
ground the shield (from lack of grounding) it has to leave that job to
the transmitting party, as it should (if I read recommendations
correctly). Hence the shielding in the SB should be left "open" without
any further connections inside it. If it is truly so, I don't know, but
if it is there is no risk in using shielded cable either, right? 

In the end, since most patch cables people use are Unshielded, the
connection is broken anyway. Thus we end up only with the in wall cable
between the patch panel and the connector at the listening location
being shielded, no problem with that either!


-- 
Gblenn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gblenn's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22759
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=92030

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to