alfista;689492 Wrote: > Interesting observation which shows that unless you make the effort of > understanding the design you may make faulty assumptions on what > operations are the most demanding. > Also, not all kinds of processing is equal from a noise perspective. It > is quite likely that operations that require a few more cpu cycles but > operate largely on cached data would cause less noise on the power > supply than more IO-intensive tasks even though they might not take as > much processing.
The audio data in the Touch is not cached per se in the tradional sense - it is held in a FIFO ram buffer, since it is read once. Some other data may be cached, though. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables Stax4070+SRM7/II phones Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
