krzys;691581 Wrote: 
> As I know DRC is very intolerant to distance differences of the speakers
> to the mike. Have you checked that? 
> 
> Audiolense, my experience:  what you describe is for me a typical phase
> misalignment result. Can you check that all your channels in the
> speakers are in phase? Have you checked your speakers with a phase
> alignment record (I use Stereophile test CD track 17). I have 5
> channels speakers; even one driver with inverted phase gives the
> described result. Another possibility would be a major time
> misalignment of the drivers, it gives the same result. Audiolense
> cannot correct for such major misalignments. Normally the center image
> should be even more on focus than not corrected. 
> 
> 1. Yes Behringer mike should be corrected since it is hot above 8 kHz,
> there isn't a "Typical" correction but you can use the attached file
> 2. At the end of the measurement Audiolense gives you the channels time
> difference, it is right to the upper frequency range in the upper part
> of the measurement window. The difference will be 0 if perfectly
> centered but as Phil said it is not a strict necessity.
> 
> Chris
Thanks Chris for the Mic calibration file!

I guess the center image would even be wrong without RC if I had phase
or time misalignment? Given I have a rather good focus without RC, I
would conclude speaker phase and time alignment are rather good by
default. Is there a risk to invert the phase of one channel due to the
measurement process? Remember also that I use my USB DAC for playback
and a USB digital recorder for recording. Can it cause phase and/or
time shifts that could explain the results?


-- 
evdplancke


------------------------------------------------------------------------
evdplancke's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43147
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93393

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to