magiccarpetride;698373 Wrote: > I don't know the answer to your question. But I'd like to, if I may, add > another question, which may tie in nicely with what you're asking: > > Is there a rationally explainable reason why Squeezebox Duet, when > feeding digital signal via digital coax into my DAC, sounds noticeably > inferior when compared to Squeezebox Touch feeding the exact same > digital signal via digital coax into the same DAC? Or is it the case > here that even those 'noticeable differences' between the Duet and the > Touch are mere fabrications coming out of the cargo cultists' deluded > pathetic minds? > > And finally, is the above question providing sufficient grounds for > banning me from this forum?
The Touch has a very different spdif circuit to the Duet and provides a cleaner signal to a connected DAC. This MAY make it easier for some DACs to perform better. There's nothing wrong with your question! -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables Stax4070+SRM7/II phones Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
