NoRoDa;699169 Wrote: > I used to write reviews myself, and I don't recognize your facts from > that time.... (Only in a small magazine and not like God's next in > command Fremer of course...) > You truly leave yourself wide open for scorn and ridicule when you > actually have an opinion about something as a reviewer, that's for > shure. ;) > I didn't have to pay listprice for the products I bought, but who does > anyway - reviewer on not? > Too much work for for too little money and not enough time to enjoy my > own system. I'm more happy like this, a blind testing we go :D > > A small note: > If the reviewers write pure BS, then why would they enjoy the very > expensive and nice sounding audio equipment? It will for shure sound no > better than cheaper gear? > > Regards
The BS part is not that the reviewers are writing that poor sounding equipment sounds good but rather in their BS testing methods, all their BS about how much better certain mega-buck equipment than other mega-buck equipment and all their BS for the reason why one piece of equipment sounds better than another. As I wrote in my first post on this thread when not only base but actually that you based your judgement on your memory of how a speaker sounded eight years ago, playing under very different conditions, you deserve all the scorn and ridicule anyone cares to toss your way. -- ralphpnj Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -> Snatch -> The Transporter -> Transporter 2 (oops) -> Touch 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94418 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
