Archimago wrote: > TAS average 70-75??!! Stunning. That is only my guess and by no means accurate. A kind of like what Soulkeeper wrote only more tongue in cheek. Is there a smiley for "tongue in cheek"? To answer my own question, yes there is: :-J means tongue in cheek.
Archimago wrote: > Of the long time reviewers, I do have great respect for John Atkinson. > In fact, Stereophile's measurements courtesy of John is the only reason > I still have a subscription. That's true but I've yet to see a meaningful measurement of USB cables. Yes, over priced, high end USB cables are my pet peeve and I rarely miss a chance to rip the audio magazines over their evidence free belief in the superiority of USB cables costing more than $25 over a well made, to specification under $25 USB cable. Archimago wrote: > As an aside, I would love to see audiophile magazines publish the DR > value for every album they review... That would be great incentive for > record labels to pay attention that many of us actually do care about > dynamic range. Has anyone seen a letter to the editor about this??? If > not, maybe I should write one.. Excellent idea! Please do write a letter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=94485 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
