JohnB wrote: > It would work fine if 96000 was used, however, IMO if your music > collection is mainly at a 44.1kHz sampling rate (e.g. CD derived) it > makes much more sense to use 88200. Little if anything will be gained > from using 96000 and the computational complexity of resampling from > 44.1 to 96 is an order of magnitude greater than that needed to resample > from 44.1 to 88.2. That also applies to Inguiz of course. > > PS I have corrected the link I gave in an earlier post. It should have > been: > http://www.meridianunplugged.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=136192#Post136192
Thanks- the link still works for me. TBH I just used used Phil Leigh's custom convert.conf settings. I appreciate the relative complexity of the sampling rate conversion, but since its being done on my multi core PC I am not sure it really matters in the way it might do for a dsp chip on a dac. It's worth pointing out that Lots of dac automatically upsample to 96 or 192 anyway, and if so I think it's better done by SOX on balance. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96098 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
