JohnB wrote: > It would work fine if 96000 was used, however, IMO if your music > collection is mainly at a 44.1kHz sampling rate (e.g. CD derived) it > makes much more sense to use 88200. Little if anything will be gained > from using 96000 and the computational complexity of resampling from > 44.1 to 96 is an order of magnitude greater than that needed to resample > from 44.1 to 88.2. That also applies to Inguiz of course. > > PS I have corrected the link I gave in an earlier post. It should have > been: > http://www.meridianunplugged.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=136192#Post136192
Tried the setting last night... Sounds good :-) not sure I can tell a difference though. will listen more. One thought I had was whether someone with a compiler has the know-how to maybe compile a custom version of SOX which *only* upsamples if the input sampling rate is lower (ie. only upsample if 44 or 48 kHz would convert to 88kHz). I wonder how difficult this would be in the SOX source code. Assuming it's well documented, may not be too hard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96098 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
