JJZolx wrote: > Here's a quote, after going into some rudimentary explanation of jitter > that he copied from somewhere: > > "It's clear to me that the burden of proof is on those who believe > jitter is audible." > > << Plunk >> Sorry, it's not completely clear to me what you're implying here. I *think* you seem to be saying that anyone who questions whether jitter has an audible effect must be wrong.
I am aware of two properly conducted listening tests where the audible effects of jitter were assessed: Benjamin & Gannon. Theoretical and audible effects of jitter on digital audio quality. 105th AES Convention, 1998 Jitter added to digital signal between transport and DAC with a hardware device. Conclusions: uncorrelated jitter inaudible below 10nS rms on pure tones; uncorrelated jitter inaudible below 20nS rms on music signal Ashihara, Kiryu et al. Detection threshold for distortions due to jitter on digital audio. Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 26, 1 (2005) Jitter simulated in the digital domain. Conclusions: uncorrelated jitter inaudible below 250nS on music signal. Both of these trials would tend to support Ethan Winer's viewpoint. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96475 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
