Quad wrote: > Even harder, but still discernible. > > The original here is 24/192 while the MP3 is 24/48, downsampled with the > built-in foobar SRC. I might hear the donwsampling algorithm and not the > codec.
Aha. You're interpreting the test results incorrectly. (You must be thinking that a high percentage is good...in fact a high percentage means something very different here) The log you posted indicates that you can't distinguish between the lossy and lossess tracks. You would want to see a % (p-value) of, say, 5% or less. But I'd be impressed with even 10% or less. bottom line, the results you posted indicate that you can't distinguish between the lossy and lossless file. More info on interpreting the ABX test here: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=16295 a little on p-values and testing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value ------------------------------------------------------------------------ garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98374 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
