garym wrote: > Aha. You're interpreting the test results incorrectly. (You must be > thinking that a high percentage is good...in fact a high percentage > means something very different here) The log you posted indicates that > you can't distinguish between the lossy and lossess tracks. You would > want to see a % (p-value) of, say, 5% or less. But I'd be impressed with > even 10% or less. bottom line, the results you posted indicate that you > can't distinguish between the lossy and lossless file. More info on > interpreting the ABX test here: > > http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=16295 > > a little on p-values and testing: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value > > Hmm... Did you have a look at all 3 logs I posted? The first two have a > p-value of 5.5% and the last one 24%. I'm not sure if those percentages > are indicating the p-value though. But 5.5% means, 8 out of 10 were > guessed correctly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quad's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98374 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
