garym wrote: > I disagree. Highly unlikely unless some really bad downsampling tool was > used. I don't often purchase > 16/44.1, but when only option is hires > download, I personally only pay for 24/96. The mastering of the 24/192 > and 24/96 is the same and the likelihood of any audible difference is > basically zero. > > edit: I have ABX'd 24/192 compared to 24/96 downsampled files (from > 24/192 source), and found no difference I could distinguish. Not through > transporter, as it can't do 24/192. But through Touch with EDO, which > *can* do 24/192.
Gary, that's precisely what I'm hoping for. I meant that the 24/192 files would be audible, not that the differences would be audible. If that's the case, I'll probably spring for the 24/192s, under the assumption that one of these days I'll have another more "modern" DAC. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bzlrbi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30606 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101940 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
