Julf wrote: > So far I haven't found a single one (and I have looked at quite a few).
leaving an opening for the rare exceptions , one can always be wrong . If i had your experience in recording I could possibly be more sure . Julf wrote: > If the reports are anecdotal and subjective, they will not be of much > value for me. If there was some sort of objective evidence of the > improvement, I would be interested. > > You keep ranting about the problems with ABX (and I assume the pretty > sophisticated ITU listening test recommendations). I would be interested > in hearing how you suggest we can get objective evidence of audible > improvements. This is funny if hypotetically ABX should be broken , there is no way to evaluate any sound differences :) As the sigthed testing methods are magnitudes more broken , they often have no information content at all . And ABX can actually be a quantifiable use of *subjektive* experiences "can you hear the diffrence" if collect several data pionts you can make an objektive result of it cool . VS the typical placebophile "test" in Absolute sound tells a nice story(fairytale) of person experiencing a product but then there is no more . -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
