Touchy wrote: > Bump and apologies - I have reread the OP and it was indeed an > invitation for you ladies to carry on as you have been. > Well done. 'Handbags at dawn' then. > > Will start a more appropriate thread for the subjectively inclined in > due course. > > Carry on I appreciate your frustration, and understand that you are asking for someone's report from what they have actually heard. Without wanting to spark off any further rowing, I wonder though whether Archimago might be able to help with this question relating to his findings here http://archimago.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/measurements-corning-usb-3-optical.html It would surely be a useful starting point to find out whether there is anything to cure.
_Do_you_still_have_an_SBT_Arch?_ As far as I can see, your corning test was carried out using a computer as a transport. I would be interested to know whether you experience the same problem with 8kHz packet noise using the SBT as transport. Since the SBT is a comparatively low powered device with (by all accounts) a well designed switchmode power supply, one might wonder whether it was better or worse than an ordinary computer [which is what I am assuming you used Arch] in doing whatever it is that that is supposed to be bad that the corning/audio regen is supposed to be curing. It seems to me that it might be a useful starting point to know whether you get the 8khz problem (and higher noise level) using the SBT into your home theatre amp. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
