jkeny wrote: > I found issues with time alignment which I posted but you don't even > need my results - look 'here' (http://www.slapmedia.com/diffmaker/)
That's interesting, will read. jkeny wrote: > Right! I take it you don't respect yourself in the morning? ;-) jkeny wrote: > They are academic as far as a consumer evaluating how a device will > sound (excepting speaker measurements) Quite the opposite. Consumer information is an opportunity, everyone can take part and learn before deciding (not) to buy. It might however be academic for some consumers, the ones who doesn't know there are measurements to be found and the ones that simply ignore them. jkeny wrote: > Yes & I suspect this is where the disputes will arise. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Is there a dispute here? Will there be? Where? jkeny wrote: > Sure, you have your approach to evaluating audio equipment, others have > theirs. Indeed. Best Regards, Gandhi not often enough well recorded and mastered cds *|* dbpoweramp with accuraterip *|* flac *|* fanless asrock z77e-itx intel i5-3570t *|* ubuntu 12.04.1 lts 32-bit *|* lms 7.8.0 *|* brutefirdrc 3.0 (rewv5) *|* transporter (balanced out) *|* thule ia252b *|* audio physic scorpio *|* no fancy cables. *+* also some booms. *+* harmony 525s for them all, including waking the server from s3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gandhi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58909 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
