Gandhi wrote: > I found a sensible answer to that question. Can't believe I didn't think > of that myself. > > "Dirac Live uses several measurement positions (9 typically) in the > listening room. This way, it is possible to find consistent acoustic > problems. Only these should be corrected." > http://www.dirac.se/en/technologies/dirac-live/technical-description.aspx > > > Of course, they don't mention how they define "consistent". Relative or > absolute difference? Perhaps an absolute difference of +/- 1dB would > suffice for amplitude. But what about the width of the corresponding > frequency band? And what about the shape of the lumps? Or could it > perhaps be possible to define consistency from the filter coefficients? > > > What do the experts (y'all) say?
I'm no expert but i do think that consistent means that if a resonance peak shows up in all positions it should really be compensated . If its in one forget about it . If the levels differs in the multiple positions find a sensible average ? That's my thinking , a pro may have a better idea . -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (spares Touch, SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103847 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
