Julf wrote: > Well, except... My point was that true audiophiles tend to declare > asynchronous sample rate converters Truly Evil - probably because they > make the whole jitter discussion a non-issue, and in a simple way, so > that can't be good. > > The answer to by SBGK's question (that no doubt was intended to be a > rhetorical one) is that when manufacturers start making their dacs with > regen type devices already included, audiophiles (and audiophile vendors > and press) will come up with even wilder theories about why that is bad > and why external, expensive (and thus exclusive) gadgets are needed.
why would they do that if the dac was immune to any gremlins fed to it ? Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104340 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
