ralphpnj wrote: > So the web site Audiostream, a "spin off"/sub web site of the main > Stereophile web site puts up a couple of posts showing that the majority > of the site's readers support the site's brand of subjective evaluation > of audio equipment. Wow what a big surprise! Perhaps a web site devoted > to autoerotic asphyxiation will now feature some showing that the > majority of the site's enjoy this practice. Now wouldn't that be another > big surprise. >
Some surprise. There is a strong tendency for computer conferences to appeal to and affirm a certain viewpoint. > > Mr. Lavorgna fails to mention what constitutes a "toxic" comment or > better yet provide a rules of conduct for the comments so that > individuals with different opinions might be able to post comments > without being banned. Note: I just posted a comment on Audiostream > asking Mr. Lavorgna to post some kind of rules of conduct. > Many not matter. Such rules are subject to personal interpretation. For example, I've seen time and again where people interpret any disagreement as being a presonal attack, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105254 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
