docbob wrote: > Good point. But isn't that true for many people on _all_ sides of _any_ > argument? >
Sure, but by using correct procedures you can obtain reliable, relevant results from time synched, level matched, DBTs. Fail to apply any of those controls and all hope of reliable results is totally lost. > And since we want to display the benefit of rational thought with > reliable evidence, shouldn't we be extra vigilant to ensure that those > who share our beliefs/knowledge not defend our point of view with > spurious or incorrect data/info? > > Just wonderin' Of course. The correct procedures for performing listening tests were first published in the 1970s. This hasn't stopped the usual suspects from skipping over the well-known correct procedures by doing things like substituting single blind tests for double blind tests. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105413 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
