docbob wrote: > Good point. But isn't that true for many people on _all_ sides of _any_ > argument? > > And since we want to display the benefit of rational thought with > reliable evidence, shouldn't we be extra vigilant to ensure that those > who share our beliefs/knowledge not defend our point of view with > spurious or incorrect data/info?
A very good point. But I do think we mostly do live up to that - I don't think there is an united "anti-foo" tribe that keeps protecting it's own. I have seen many of us point out errors in data and rationale in arguments, no matter which side is argued. "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105413 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
