drmatt wrote: 
> I don't think it can be a bad thing to qualify individual ADCs and DACs
> such as this process entails in an end-to-end manner.

Qualifying DACs can be a bad idea if it is part of a scheme that has no
reliably perceptible benefits and raises the cost of DACs.  Well, its
bad to those of us who spend real money on real hardware and aren't like
trust fund babies.

One of the things that needs to be understood is what kind of
performance differences does it take to deliver an audible difference,
let alone an audible benefit.

For example, a recent AES paper (I cited in a recent post) found the
following:

20559

The interpretation of this is that dynamic range improvements above 85
dB have not been found to be audible with any music under any
circumstance, and improvements above 70 dB are not audible in most
cases.

Similarly,  improvements that effect response above 18-20 KHz have not
been found to be audible with any music under any circumstance, and
improvements above 13-14 kHz are not audible in most cases.

In both the cases of dynamic range and frequency response, a good clean
CD-quality system exceeds or meets the most stringent requirements.  MQA
does not have reliably perceptible benefits. Obviously, we have pleny of
evidence that it does show a benefit in sighted evaluations, but that
should be taken as yet another valid condemnation of sighted evaluations
for critical decisions like these.


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Filename: individual high res audio.jpg                            |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=20559|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105070

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to