Funny. It's a duck. So to disprove the value of this duck is very much
to show that the temporal information on the timescales talked about is
either irrelevant (I.e. physically incapable of being heard) or is
preserved in standard recording/playback techniques anyway without mqa
help.

There's a lot in here that acknowledged what you guys have been saying
for years - to whit that "literally no one needs more than 20 bits" and
that "actually for the vast majority of recordings 16 bit will do" and
secondly that higher sample rates alone do nothing to improve the
situation for the benefits the paper talks about. Right?




------------------------------------------------------------------------
drmatt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=59498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105070

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to