garym wrote: > The evidence burden falls upon the person making the claim. You've > provided no valid evidence for any of your claims. See: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot > > That said, one is always free to enjoy their own subjective "truths" as > long as they don't harm others. If you like one DAC more than another, > you're free to think whatever you want. But we're talking about science > and engineering here. Not opinions.** > > **Lots of people post opinions where opinions matter on this forum and > there are no arguments. For example, people post opinions about what > sort of music they like, which artist's albums are their "best", etc. > These are the areas where subjective opinions truly are OK. There is > little in the way of science and engineering that can tell me which > period of Bob Dylan music I prefer the most that is generalizable to a > larger population. > > Note: others have pointed out in this forum that the audiophilia > disease (denial of science and engineering) that has affected many in > this hobby does in fact do harm. It is a tip of the larger societal > problem where we now have many people who act as if science doesn't > matter and all opinions are "equal" regardless of source (expertise, > evidence, etc.).
Since when did listening to music become a science? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106575 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
