Mnyb wrote: > Yes you did a DBT . But there must be something wrong . > > Its about probability. > > Some parameter is off I did not do the test with you . > > That claim is very very improbable, if all conciviable parameters where > the same and the output really was bit perfect . > > By that i mean that there is no mechanism that could really change the > sound of the conected DAC . > > Its not *you* these kind of cliams come all the time from every > archetypal audiophile out there . > > Almost everything you have claimed as audiophile truths in our forum has > been thoroughly debunked decades ago . > There realy is nothing new. > > Fantastic claims require very ver solid evidence . > > As I told you I sympathise. I been like you a decade ago and i was also > convinced every bizarre audiophile tweak I did to my system made a real > differences , because i could "hear" it .
Okay, you win. Not that I agree with you, I still think you are wrong, but I conceit to going back and forth on this subject. Sorry I can't unhear what I heard, even if I did see pages of data that PROVE otherwise. I extend my hand for a firm handshake. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ edwardthern's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66099 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106575 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
