drmatt wrote: 
> So what about we avoid the resampling step to 44/16 and just start
> shipping the digital masters in 96/24 or whatever they are? Why would
> anyone object?

Most of them seem to be 48/24. 95% of music buyers would probably object
to having to pay the extra cost of shipping files that are more than 3
times as big as needed (and mostly containing random noise or empty
bytes).



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106621

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to