Wombat wrote: > No, never listened to that album. I have compared several music releases > over time. All i can say that in 2001 the typical tendency to master > re-releases was often ugly effect pushing, wrong EQ decissions and > dynamic compression.
This may be the point: that the 2001 "re-master", for all its extra tracks, may simply be a poor transcription of the original master sound. Since the 2014 version sounds much more musical to my ears (albeit stupidly labelled as Hi-Res), I can live with that suggestion unless someone can come up with any other explanation. Better get -*some*- sleep... Dave :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Golden Earring's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66646 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
