darrenyeats wrote: 
> Arny,
> The reason I referred to Linkwitz is to establish a point. That point
> being: the fact a complex signal will exhibit IM components greater than
> the HD components, does not mean the HD measurement is uninteresting. I
> wasn't implying more, but it's quite enough.
> 

So you want some kind of award for contradicting me and then
paraphrasing the what I said?

> 
> So, when someone posits that certain HD profiles might be related to
> euphony, one cannot contradict simply by pointing out, with complex
> signals, IM components are greater than HD components.
> 

No visible connection between the two commencements, so any inference is
non existent.

> 
> This is exactly what you did here:
> 
> Here's another way to look it. Certain HD characteristics could have an
> association with certain -other IM- characteristics, given their
> relationship as you discussed. Again, this would mean IM components
> being generally greater than HD does not speak against certain HD
> profiles having a relationship to euphony (the old cause versus
> association chestnut).
> 
> Once again, to argue the position that certain HD profiles might be
> related to euphony is you need to provide more than you have up to now.
> 
> That isn't to say certain HD profiles ARE related to euphony, or that
> you, or someone else, can't come up with a good explanation why they are
> not related to euphony! It's just I think we need more explanation than
> we've seen.
> 
> 

Come on Darren, please stop obfuscating and playing with words. You
claim that I said something but then you provide your own words, not a
quote of what I said. And then some of your made up words are false.

The statement "Certain HD characteristics could have an association with
certain -other IM- characteristics" is a vast understatement of the
facts of the matter.  There is a fixed relationship between any HD
characteristic and any IM characteristic that is dependent on which
characteristics you choose to study the relationship(s) between.   So,
it is not a matter of "could have" it is a matter of *does have*.  The
comparison is highly flawed because it is susceptible to cherry-picking.


Furthermore, It is not uncommon to have  measured THD that vastly
understates the nonlinearity that is present by means of low pass
filtering. For example estimating nonlinear distortion above 10 KHz in a
CD player by means of measuring harmonics is false because the harmonics
are outside the natural bandpass of the CD player.  But many IM products
are sidebands of the signal and thus are nearly the same frequency as
the signal and thus difficult or impossible to filter out.  The end
result can easily be massive audible and ugly aharmonic IM with no
measurable HD at all. Just ignore the built-in filtering starting around
20 KHz.

I know that euphonic distortion is a canonical part of much golden ear
dogma, and that many true believers in anti-scientific audio will fight
the Science to the death.  

The primary reason why equipment with audible harmonic distortion are
tolerated is that the high distortion only happens under rare
operational circumstances. One can see this kind of cherry-picking of
demos at just about any high end audio show. SET amps with high
full-power distortion are demoed with high efficiency speakers at lower
listening levels where there naturally is not all that much distortion.


The loudspeakers used are complementary to the SET's poor performance
into loads with varying impedance by contouring the speaker's impedance
curve to boost the mid bass and drop the upper midrange, creating a warm
sound.  

It is all a set up to perpetuate the fiction that measurements don't
matter. This helps the same dealers sell magic cables with no relevant
audible measurable characteristics, which is confirmed by means of
sighted evaluations.  Darren, why are you trying to be complacent with
all this?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106914

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to