|
Jim:
In
the banking environment, the employee account info is not normally restricted
from auditor views. In fact, some 'best-practice' audit programs includes
steps to review accounts of associates who work in sensitive areas. An HR
policy provides the umbrella of 'fiscal responsibility' and monitoring
acitivies. A subpeana is not necessary for any internal
account. However, personal account info that is external to the bank
deposit/loan account would require more legal finesse. As always, a
reasoned support would be necessary of course [ e.g. NSF, kiting, lifestyle
clues, audit...].
My
question in return would be the 'legal' aspect that you have brought in.
Certain new regs [US Patriot, Sarbanes-Oxley] as well as older regs [OFAC, BSA,
Reg O] allow and require this type of activity on any account - employee or
otherwise. Would the concern be with the precedent set by the reaction to
certain activity [discrimination, bias] rather than the actual viewing of the
info?
Your
thoughts...
Paul
Hugenberg
Bank
Regional Audit Manager/IT Audit Officer
|
- Employee Monitoring BILL GALATIOTO
- RE: Employee Monitoring Kaplan, Jim
- US Patriot Act Hugenberg III, Paul
- US Patriot Act Sharon Haapala
- FW: Employee Monitoring Kaplan, Jim
- RE: Employee Monitoring Kaplan, Jim
- FW: Employee Monitoring Kaplan, Jim
- RE: Employee Monitoring Hugenberg III, Paul
