Hi Ryan,
Ryan Jud Hughes:
> It seems that aufs's unionctl wants a command like:
> unionctl /UNION --mode /foo ro
>
> whereas unionfs's wanted a command like:
> unionctl /UNION --mode ro /foo
:::
> Is there any reason not to do this?
Because unionctl.c in unionfs-1.4.tar.gz shows us,
fprintf(stderr, "\tunionctl UNION --mode BRANCH (rw|ro|nfsro)\n");
Unionfs-unionctl may accept the both cases.
Junjiro Okajima
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
