Oh, okay. It looks like, although both work in unionfs, putting the branch first is the preferred form. I'll change my scripts.
Thanks. --Ryan On Thu, 17 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Ryan, > > Ryan Jud Hughes: >> It seems that aufs's unionctl wants a command like: >> unionctl /UNION --mode /foo ro >> >> whereas unionfs's wanted a command like: >> unionctl /UNION --mode ro /foo > ::: >> Is there any reason not to do this? > > Because unionctl.c in unionfs-1.4.tar.gz shows us, > > fprintf(stderr, "\tunionctl UNION --mode BRANCH (rw|ro|nfsro)\n"); > > Unionfs-unionctl may accept the both cases. > > > Junjiro Okajima > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
