On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:11:08AM +0300, Василишин Андрей wrote:
>
> >
> > What you need would be, md-raid, not aufs. I think md-raid is probably
> > better for your need.
> >
> > You can see http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO.html for details.
> >
> No, I made software RAID5, which failed. I lost ~ 4.5 Tb of data. Now I
> want storage, if one of the disks fail, I will not lose all data.
Then you want RAID1 or RAID10 .
RAID1 = Mirroring, so you will all these 9drives as 1 drive of 440GB ... and
if (all-1) fails you still have your data, but you'll see only
440GB.
RAID10(Raid1+Raid0) = Mirroring + Strip, you will make some disks act as
RAID1 and each RAID1 will interact as a RAID0. You'll
get more Gigabytes, but if the disks in RAID1 fails
you lose everything.
Or what you can do is to create a some partitions and make diferent RAIDs
for each partition.
>
> --
> WBR, Andrey Vasilishin CDIG1-UANIC, CDIG1-RIPE
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
--
Bruno Ribas - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://web.inf.ufpr.br/ribas
C3SL: http://www.c3sl.ufpr.br
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
