Kernel John: > There were cases when neither reval nor remount were effective. > Our development environment is based on often changed branches. There were > cases, when modification times of files on aufs were not updated after > modifying them on branches. It makes our cache mechanism not working because > it relays on modification time. udba=inotify was doing just fine in this > case.
Hmm,,, I have to agree when changing branch directly is so often, aufs may be wrong... Ok, I will revert/restore the feature in the future. Probably the next version of 'baseN' series. Thank you J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
