On Tue January 27 2009, sf...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > > Kernel John: > > There were cases when neither reval nor remount were effective. > > Our development environment is based on often changed branches. There were > > cases, when modification times of files on aufs were not updated after > > modifying them on branches. It makes our cache mechanism not working because > > it relays on modification time. udba=inotify was doing just fine in this > > case. > > Hmm,,, > I have to agree when changing branch directly is so often, aufs may be > wrong... > Ok, I will revert/restore the feature in the future. Probably the next > version of 'baseN' series. >
Super! Now if we could just clone J.R. - get a half dozen of the clones at work. . . By the way, How are the donations holding up? Are you staying warm and fed? ;) Mike > Thank you > J. R. Okajima > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
