Yioryos Asprobounitis: > =0AI guess my assumption the 3.x-rcN is closer to 3.1 than 3.0 is wrong.=0A= > Indeed the 3.0 branch compiles fine with the 3.1 kernel.=0AMaybe 3.x-rcN sh= > ould be renamed to something emphasizing that the `rcN' part is the importa= > nt part. Or just write it clearly in the instructions.=0AThanks again=0A=0A=
Would suggest the clearyly written instructions if you have? J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
