Hi Mike, On 04.10.2012 17:41, Michael S. Zick wrote: > On Thu October 4 2012, you wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> >> >> On 03.10.2012 21:56, Michael S. Zick wrote: >>> Is this the same problem you (well, a person with the same name) >>> reported on the Linux-VServer list, using the Linux-VServer >>> patched kernel + auFS + gluster? >>> >>> Mike >>> >> yes it is - slightly modified after some more testing - why are you asking? >> > Because you are asking about the behavior of a kernel with at least > two patches applied, Linux-VServer and auFS. > > And as you indicated by posting on both lists, you know the problem > might be in either patch set - or > in the combination of the patch sets. After doing some more tests, I suspect aufs. The vserver list was a "nice try" as I know that there are a lot of people with "weird" setups and I was uncertain is this is "just a configuration problem" with capabilities or fuse or whatever that someone else has already seen. > I never saw on this mailing list your response to JRO's request > for additional information. Perhaps you didn't cc the list. I didnt send anything yet, as I was not able to put together the info Oli
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
